Ethereum trades below realized price while network activity stays strong, but weak capital flows and policy delays still cloud the bottom call.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- Tom Lee bases his call on realized price, not sentiment, which provides a data-driven foundation for the bullish case.
- Ethereum network utility remains robust, with daily active addresses consistently exceeding 700,000.
- Deflationary supply trends and shrinking exchange balances are effectively limiting systemic selling pressure.
- Persistent institutional caution and U.S. regulatory delays continue to act as a drag on price momentum.
Ethereum is currently navigating a volatile range, trading around $2,066 following a sharp market reset that purged speculative positioning.
Fundstrat’s Tom Lee suggests this correction has pushed ETH approximately 22% below its realized price – a technical threshold that historically signaled the genesis of the 2025 rebound.
“So we’re at the level where in 2025, Ethereum started to turn higher,” Lee noted, characterizing the current $2,200 region as “severely undervalued” for a network serving as the primary settlement layer for global finance.
However, institutional sentiment remains fragmented. Citigroup recently lowered its 12-month price target to $3,175, citing a “narrowing window of opportunity” for U.S. legislative progress.
With global fund flows shifting back into negative territory, the market is caught between a fundamental floor and a macroeconomic ceiling.
Is Ethereum truly carving out a bottom, or is there further downside ahead? Here is our expert analysis.
RECOMMENDED: When Will Ethereum Reach $5,000? Experts Say Sooner Than You Think
Tom Lee’s Bottom Call Has Strong Logic
Tom Lee’s thesis does not rely on immediate price appreciation but rather on the exhaustion of selling force.
His analysis centers on the realized price – a metric calculating the average cost basis of all coins moved on-chain.
When market price dips significantly below this level, long-term “diamond hand” holders historically cease selling, as doing so would lock in substantial losses.

Lee frames Ethereum as entering a “supercycle,” driven by traditional finance integration.
He points out that the market has already absorbed heavy liquidations, moving into the same “value zone” that preceded the last major cyclical upturn.
While this setup does not guarantee an instant rally, it suggests a stabilization phase where prices find a floor before confidence eventually returns.
This institutional perspective is supported by Standard Chartered’s Geoff Kendrick, who recently maintained a $7,500 year-end target, citing the expansion of stablecoin settlements on the mainnet.
Network Data Still Looks Healthy
On-chain metrics reinforce the argument that Ethereum’s utility is decoupled from its current price weakness.
Data from Etherscan and YCharts confirms 714,565 daily active addresses as of March 23 – a staggering 93% increase compared to the previous year.

Furthermore, ERC-20 token activity continues to scale, with over 875,000 active addresses engaging with the ecosystem daily.
The network’s underlying throughput remains historic; Ethereum processed approximately 2.49 million transactions in a single 24-hour window this week.
These figures do not reflect a network in decline; rather, they illustrate a vibrant economy that is growing even as asset prices consolidate.
Supply dynamics further bolster the bullish narrative. The total circulating supply has drifted down to 117.77 million ETH, reflecting the ongoing burn mechanism.
Liquid supply on centralized exchanges is also tightening, with Binance holding roughly 3.50 million ETH and Coinbase at 3.14 million.

This scarcity on trading platforms creates a “supply shock” potential: once macroeconomic headwinds clear, even a moderate return in demand could trigger an outsized move to the upside.
RECOMMENDED: ETH, XRP or Cardano – Where Are Investors Putting Money Today?
Why We Do Not Fully Agree…Yet
Despite strong network fundamentals, Ethereum cannot escape the gravity of broader macroeconomic and regulatory risks.
Citigroup’s Alex Saunders recently lowered the bank’s ETH target from $4,304 to $3,175, warning that the “Clarity Act” has stalled in the U.S. Senate.
“Regulatory catalysts will drive further adoption and flows, but the window of opportunity for U.S. legislation this year is narrowing,” Saunders noted in a recent briefing.
The impasse over stablecoin yield rules and legislative gridlock has dampened the “institutional era” enthusiasm that defined early 2026.
Capital flows also dictate a cautious stance. Glassnode reports that investors shifted toward stablecoins throughout February and March, a classic “risk-off” signal.
This mirrors a broader trend in traditional markets, where Reuters reported over $20 billion in global equity fund outflows in a single week.
As long as geopolitical tensions keep oil prices elevated and the Federal Reserve remains hawkish, Ethereum’s recovery may be delayed regardless of its on-chain strength.
That being said, if we do see geopolitical tensions fade, a move could be instant and explosive for ETH.
RECOMMENDED: Citi Updates Ethereum Forecast: Still Sees 49% Upside For ETH
Bottom Zone Possible, But Not Confirmed
The logic behind Tom Lee’s bottom call is technically sound. Ethereum is currently supported by record-high network usage, a shrinking supply, and a valuation level that has historically served as a springboard for reversals.
The convergence of DeFi growth and asset tokenization ensures the network’s long-term relevance.
However, the “final low” remains unconfirmed. Until we see a definitive shift in global capital flows and a breakout from the current descending technical channel, Ethereum remains in a “bottoming range” rather than a confirmed bull trend.
Investors should watch for a sustained daily close above the $2,350 resistance level as the first signal that the bottom is truly in.
Join eToro today and receive $10 in free crypto on your first deposit. Trade crypto, stocks, and ETFs with powerful tools and social investing features like CopyTrader™
Crypto investments are risky and may not suit retail investors; you could lose your entire investment. Understand the risks here


